Opinion
Submitted February 11, 1965
Decided February 11, 1965
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended, upon consent of counsel for both parties and in conformity with one of the alternatives permitted by the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in Jackson v. Denno ( 378 U.S. 368), so as to vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and to remand the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new trial.