People v. Isakov

Full title: The People, etc., respondent, v. Mikhail Isakov, also known as Mikhail…

Court: Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 62630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2012-04332 2012-04333 2012-04334 M150262 2012-04338 2012-04339 2012-04340 2012-04341 2012-04346 Ind. No. 9283/10

01-24-2013

The People, etc., respondent, v. Mikhail Isakov, also known as Mikhail Izaikov, also known as Mikhail Izraikov, appellant. (Appeal No. 1) The People, etc., respondent, v. Arthur Ibragimov, appellant. (Appeal No. 2) The People, etc., respondent, v. David Ibragimov, also known as David Ibragmchayev, appellant. (Appeal No. 3) The People, etc., respondent, v. Mikhail Isakov, also known as Mikhail Izaikov, also known as Mikhail Izraikov, appellant. (Appeal No. 4) The People, etc., respondent, v. MB Globus, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 5) The People, etc., respondent, v. AN International, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 6) The People, etc., respondent, v. MA Concord, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 7) The People, etc., respondent, v. NA Continental Group, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 8) The People, etc., respondent, v. SI Premier Enterprises, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 9)

MARK C. DILLON

, J.P.

THOMAS A. DICKERSON

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL

SYLVIA HINDS-RADIX, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellants for leave to file a joint brief and appendix on appeals from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 4, 2012, and three judgments of the same court rendered April 5, 2012. Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged, and the appellant's joint appendix and the appellant's joint brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court are accepted for filing and deemed timely served.

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court