From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Irizarry

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 22, 1994
641 N.E.2d 1073 (N.Y. 1994)

Opinion

Decided September 22, 1994

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, David Stadtmauer, J.

Francis P. Karam, New York City, for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney of Bronx County, Bronx (Raphael J. Berman of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant appeals by permission of a dissenting Associate Justice of the Appellate Division. Since the determination below involves an undisturbed mixed question of law and fact, which finds support in the record, we therefore affirm.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Irizarry

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 22, 1994
641 N.E.2d 1073 (N.Y. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Irizarry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE IRIZARRY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 22, 1994

Citations

641 N.E.2d 1073 (N.Y. 1994)
641 N.E.2d 1073
617 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly…

People v. Cross

If after a lawful traffic stop an officer has a reasonable basis to fear for his safety, he may take any…