From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Irizarry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 16, 2022
203 A.D.3d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2017–10087 Ind. No. 2016–00161

03-16-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Nathan IRIZARRY, appellant.

Nathan Irizarry, Comstock, NY, appellant pro se. Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.


Nathan Irizarry, Comstock, NY, appellant pro se.

Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2020 ( People v. Irizarry, 184 A.D.3d 667, 124 N.Y.S.3d 388 ), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered September 5, 2017.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

LASALLE, P.J., BRATHWAITE NELSON, MALTESE and FORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Irizarry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 16, 2022
203 A.D.3d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Irizarry

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Nathan IRIZARRY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
161 N.Y.S.3d 853