From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Irizarry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1193 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-27

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tony J. IRIZARRY, Appellant.

Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for appellant. James E. Conboy, District Attorney, Fonda (Sarah J. Leszczynski of counsel), for respondent.



Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for appellant. James E. Conboy, District Attorney, Fonda (Sarah J. Leszczynski of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, SPAIN, MALONE JR. and GARRY, JJ.

MERCURE, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Montgomery County (Catena, J.), entered May 27, 2010, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Upon pleading guilty to one count of criminal sexual act in the second degree in satisfaction of a 12–count indictment, defendant was sentenced to a prison term of three years, to be followed by a period of postrelease supervision. In anticipation of his release from prison, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders prepared a risk assessment instrument in accordance with the Sex Offender Registration Act ( see Correction Law art. 6–C), presumptively classifying defendant as a risk level III sex offender. Following a hearing, County Court adopted the Board's recommendation and classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender. Defendant appeals.

Despite his claim that he no longer abuses drugs or alcohol, defendant's history—including his admission that he began to use both marihuana and alcohol in his teens, his subsequent diagnosis as cocaine, alcohol and cannabis dependent, and his prior unsuccessful participation in alcohol and substance abuse treatment programs—supports County Court's assessment of 15 points for drug and alcohol abuse ( see People v. Reyes, 48 A.D.3d 267, 268, 851 N.Y.S.2d 489 [2008],lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 711, 860 N.Y.S.2d 484, 890 N.E.2d 247 [2008];People v. Whaley, 38 A.D.3d 1106, 1107, 833 N.Y.S.2d 673 [2007] ). As for his criminal history, although most of defendant's numerous past offenses were misdemeanors, he also had a youthful offender adjudication for attempted burglary in the second degree, a class D violent felony, warranting the assessment of 30 points ( see People v. Stacconi, 81 A.D.3d 1046, 1046–1047, 916 N.Y.S.2d 310 [2011];People v. Irving, 45 A.D.3d 1389, 1389–1390, 846 N.Y.S.2d 487 [2007],lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 703, 854 N.Y.S.2d 103, 883 N.E.2d 1010 [2008] ). Accordingly, defendant was properly classified as a risk level III sex offender.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ROSE, SPAIN, MALONE JR. and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Irizarry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1193 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Irizarry

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tony J. IRIZARRY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 1193 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
951 N.Y.S.2d 596
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6330

Citing Cases

People v. Francis

factor for the defendant's age of 20 or less when he committed his first act of sexual misconduct,…

People v. Briscoe

Defendant challenges the assessment of 15 points for history of drug or alcohol abuse under risk factor 11.…