Opinion
July 12, 1996
Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Murad, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Oneida County Court to make findings of fact and to determine whether defendant was present at the in-chambers Sandoval hearing ( People v. Ireland, 222 A.D.2d 1075). The court concluded, based upon the testimony of the Trial Judge, that defendant was present at the Sandoval conference. Although the testimony of the Trial Judge was disputed, the record supports the hearing court's conclusion that defendant was present ( see, People v. Wiggins, 227 A.D.2d 918; People v. Terry, 225 A.D.2d 1058).
Defendant contends that reversal is required because a sidebar conference with a juror concerning the possible disqualification of another juror was held in his absence. "Given the nature and scope of the inquiry here, we cannot conclude that defendant's right to be present was violated" ( People v. Torres, 80 N.Y.2d 944, 945, rearg denied 81 N.Y.2d 784; see, People v. Aguilera, 82 N.Y.2d 23, 34). We reject defendant's contention that the stenographic record is incomplete and cannot be reconstructed sufficiently to allow appellate review.