From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ireland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant concerning County Court's Sandoval ruling does not survive his plea of guilty (see, People v Green, 146 A.D.2d 281, affd 75 N.Y.2d 902, cert denied 498 U.S. 860). Considering the factors set forth in People v Taranovich ( 37 N.Y.2d 442, 445), we conclude that defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see, People v Jones, 188 A.D.2d 745, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 888). Viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case as of the time of representation, we further conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). Finally, the sentence imposed is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Ireland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Ireland

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PATRICK IRELAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

People v. Hutchings

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant concerning County Court's Sandoval…