From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Iodice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1985
112 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 15, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.).


Judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Our review of the record compels the conclusion that the People established, beyond a reasonable doubt, defendant's guilt of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unlawful possession of a vehicle identification number plate. Clearly, the jury chose not to credit defendant's evidence and drew a reasonable inference of defendant's guilty knowledge from the circumstantial evidence adduced at trial. Accordingly, we will not disturb the verdict.

We also find that the court correctly determined that defendant implicitly waived his right to remain silent, in his attorney's presence, and that any statements made by him were admissible ( see, North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369; People v. Davis, 55 N.Y.2d 731). Additionally, the factual issue of whether defendant made any statements was properly submitted to the jury ( see, People v. Washington, 51 N.Y.2d 214).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Iodice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1985
112 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Iodice

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN IODICE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Sheldon

Certainly, such proof may be shown circumstantially, and a jury, under proper circumstances, may rely upon…