From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ingram

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 29, 1991
175 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

August 29, 1991

Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Hanofee, J.).


On this appeal, the only issue raised by defendant is whether the concurrent prison sentences he received of 4 to 12 years upon his plea of guilty were harsh and excessive. In rejecting his claim, we note that at the time of his plea no promises were made other than that the sentences imposed would be made to run concurrently. The sentences were well within the statutory guidelines and the plea was in full satisfaction of a five-count indictment. Under these circumstances, and given the nature of the crime involved, we find no abuse of discretion by County Court in the sentences it imposed (see, People v Honsinger, 162 A.D.2d 877, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 894; People v Dean, 155 A.D.2d 774, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 812).

Casey, J.P., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ingram

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 29, 1991
175 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM INGRAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 29, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 771

Citing Cases

People v. Windley

The bargained-for sentence was within the statutory guidelines. Given the nature of the crime involved, we…