Opinion
360906
01-26-2023
People of Michigan v. Mark Allen Ingersoll Jr
LC No. 21-016514-FH
ORDER
Michael F. Gadola, Chief Judge Pro Tem, acting under MCR 7.211(E)(2), orders:
The motion to reinstate oral argument and to accept untimely motion to remand is GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that the request for oral argument is GRANTED and the Clerk's Office is directed to accept for filing the motion to remand provided as an attachment to the present motion. Notably, the current MCR 7.211(C)(1) no longer imposes a time limit on filing a motion to remand, so it was unnecessary for defendant to file a motion to ask this Court to accept the motion to remand for filing.
However, because plaintiff might not have known if the motion to remand would be accepted for filing until the decision on the present motion, plaintiff may timely file an answer to the motion to remand within 21 days after the date of this order.