In re I.L.

Full title: In re I.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court: COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: May 21, 2018

2d Juv. No. B283224 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 21, 2018)

Opinion

2d Juv. No. B283224

05-21-2018

In re I.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. I.L., Defendant and Appellant.

Nadezhda Habinek, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TANGEMAN, J.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. TJ22651)
(Los Angeles County)

I.L., a minor, appeals from an order adjudicating him a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.

I.L. and another individual approached A.W. while he was walking alone. One of the two individuals pushed A.W., and the other one punched A.W. in the face. One of the individuals grabbed A.W.'s phone, and the two of them ran away. During an interview with an officer, A.W. identified I.L. as one of the individuals. I.L. admitted to another officer that he punched A.W.

At the adjudication hearing, the juvenile court found true the allegation that I.L. committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). The court declared I.J. a ward of the court, and placed him home on probation with terms and conditions.

We appointed counsel to represent I.L. in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues. On March 1, 2018, we advised I.L. that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that I.L.'s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The order is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

TANGEMAN, J. We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

PERREN, J.

Donna Groman, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

Nadezhda Habinek, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.