From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 8, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as it must be at this stage ( People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied ___ US ___, 105 S Ct 327), it is plain that the evidence adduced at trial established that defendant was guilty of the charges of which he was convicted.

The sentence of 25 years to life imposed for felony murder was not an abuse of discretion by the sentencing Judge, and the facts of this case do not warrant our substituting our discretion for that of the sentencing Judge ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Hyde

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES HYDE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

In any event, the allocution satisfied the basic requirements of People v. Harris ( 61 N.Y.2d 9) and thus…

People v. Nowlin

The pictures, which cannot be characterized as gruesome or lurid, were probative in that they complemented…