Opinion
October 29, 1990
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record of the suppression hearing concerning the photographic array presented separately to witnesses within a week of the crime and a lineup procedure which took place one year later demonstrates that both procedures were fair and were conducted without suggestion as to which individual, if any, should be identified. The County Court thus properly denied suppression of the identification testimony (see, e.g., People v Rodriguez, 64 N.Y.2d 738). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.