From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hurley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Order of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — CPL art 440.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

County Court properly denied defendant's CPL article 440 motion without conducting a hearing ( see, CPL 440.30 [c], [d]). Defendant concedes on appeal that three of the four grounds alleged are foreclosed from review by CPL 440.10 (2) (a) and (b). The remaining ground lacks merit because the supplemental record on appeal establishes that defendant was afforded funds to hire forensic witnesses.


Summaries of

People v. Hurley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Hurley

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL HURLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 780