ruling that the trial court's striking of all the pro se defendant's testimony, when he refused to answer what he believed to be repetitive, irrelevant prosecution questions, was erroneous
Summary of this case from State v. Schnelle1988.
[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 1169 — 1191 CONTAINING PEOPLE v. HUNTER HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]
Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated November 17, 1988.
ruling that the trial court's striking of all the pro se defendant's testimony, when he refused to answer what he believed to be repetitive, irrelevant prosecution questions, was erroneous
Summary of this case from State v. SchnelleFull title:People v. Hunter
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1988
See also People v. Reynolds, 199 Cal.Rptr. 379, 382 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 1984) (ruling that the trial court did…