Opinion
October 22, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions relating to the prosecutor's conduct during summation, insofar as preserved for appellate review, are without merit. The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 248-252).
The defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was excessive is without merit (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.