From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hugennie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2002
295 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

98-10632

Submitted April 29, 2002

June 3, 2002

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered October 14, 1998, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (six counts), attempted aggravated assault on a police officer (six counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Nadja Schulz of counsel), for respondent.

SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the prosecutor's improper comments during summation constituted reversible error is largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v. Tonge, 93 N.Y.2d 838; People v. Scotti, 220 A.D.2d 543). In any event, the comments and conduct did not exceed the bounds of permissible rhetoric, were properly responsive to the defendant's summation, and were a fair comment on the evidence (see People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Guerrero, 250 A.D.2d 703; People v. Gamble, 215 A.D.2d 584).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hugennie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2002
295 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Hugennie

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. STATHOS HUGENNIE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
743 N.Y.S.2d 288

Citing Cases

People v. Urena

The defendant's claim that statements made by the prosecutor during summation constituted reversible error is…

People v. Smith

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's allegedly improper comments during summation constituted…