From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1996
233 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 12, 1996.

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.), imposed June 19, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Before: Rosenblatt, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Altman, JJ.


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant did not effectively waive his right to appeal from the sentence imposed. The record does not afford a sufficient basis for concluding that there was a knowing waiver of the defendant's right to appeal. There was no record discussion between the court and the defendant concerning the waiver. There was not even an attempt by the court to ascertain on the record an acknowledgment from the defendant that he had, in fact, signed the waiver or that, if he had, he was aware of its contents ( see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283).

Nonetheless, we conclude that the sentence imposed by the court was not excessive ( see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

[ See, AD2d, Oct. 14, 1997.]


Summaries of

People v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1996
233 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK HUDSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 573