From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2003
2 A.D.3d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2461.

December 11, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered January 28, 2003, convicting defendant, on her plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing her to a term of 3½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Richard Nahas, for Respondent.

Robert S. Dean, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams, Lerner, JJ.


The court properly denied youthful offender treatment. Since defendant was convicted of an armed felony, she was not eligible for youthful offender treatment in the absence of mitigating circumstances that "bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was committed" (CPL 720.10[a],[3]). The record does not establish such mitigating circumstances, and, given the circumstances of the crime, youthful offender treatment was not warranted in any event.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2003
2 A.D.3d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TANISA HUDSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 466

Citing Cases

People v. Woullard

We recognize that an age-eligible defendant who has been convicted of an excluded felony may seek youthful…

People v. Colon

Turning to the merits, CPL 720.10 provides that a defendant is not eligible for youthful offender status…