From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hudson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 31, 2013
108 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-31

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michelle HUDSON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsí of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Gregory Musso on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsí of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Gregory Musso on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), imposed October 26, 2011, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

The resentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., SKELOS, ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hudson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 31, 2013
108 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michelle HUDSON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

Citations

108 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5540
969 N.Y.S.2d 797