From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 28, 2013
830 N.W.2d 388 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 146577. COA No. 303437.

2013-05-28

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vincent Edward HUDSON, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall include among the issues to be answered whether the evidence seized from the defendant when he was on his patio in his backyard was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, whether the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the exclusionary rule should not be applied, and whether defense counsel performed deficiently in failing to move to suppress the evidence.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.


Summaries of

People v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 28, 2013
830 N.W.2d 388 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vincent Edward…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

830 N.W.2d 388 (Mich. 2013)