From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Huddleston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1986
125 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 19, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals his conviction of robbery, first and second degrees, criminal use of a firearm, first degree, and menacing, stemming from the robbery of a cab driver in Syracuse. Defendant argues that the improper admission of statements by his codefendant Parks, which we found deprived Parks of a fair trial (People v. Parks, 120 A.D.2d 920), also deprived him of a fair trial. Defendant's argument is without merit. The statements by Parks, which concerned Parks' location prior to the incident and the amount of money he was carrying, did not implicate defendant. There was no reasonable possibility that the improperly admitted evidence contributed to defendant's conviction (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237).

We have examined defendant's remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Huddleston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1986
125 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Huddleston

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHNNY FRANK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)