From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hsu

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2012
97 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-5

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jack HSU, appellant.


Del Atwell, East Hampton, N.Y., for appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), imposed December 22, 2009, which, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and stalking in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on December 12, 2001.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed determinate sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a *334term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed did not subject him to double jeopardy ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952;People v. Jones, 94 A.D.3d 1146, 942 N.Y.S.2d 797;People v. Battle, 94 A.D.3d 1014, 942 N.Y.S.2d 362).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., BALKIN, HALL and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hsu

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2012
97 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Hsu

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jack HSU, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 5, 2012

Citations

97 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5437
947 N.Y.S.2d 333

Citing Cases

People v. Fox

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed…