From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hoyt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 23, 2013
106 A.D.3d 1340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-23

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adrian K. HOYT Jr., Appellant.

Theodore J. Stein, Woodstock, for appellant. John M. Muehl, District Attorney, Cooperstown (Michael F. Getman of counsel), for respondent.



Theodore J. Stein, Woodstock, for appellant. John M. Muehl, District Attorney, Cooperstown (Michael F. Getman of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., ROSE, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ.

McCARTHY, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Burns, J.), rendered September 11, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of aggravated sexual abuse in the third degree.

Defendant was charged by indictment with aggravated sexual abuse in the third degree. He pleaded guilty as charged and waived his right to appeal. Prior to sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea, arguing that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and was coerced into pleading guilty. County Court denied the motion without a hearing and subsequently imposed the agreed-upon sentence of six months in jail and 10 years of probation. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Initially, defendant can challenge the voluntariness of his plea despite his waiver of appeal ( see People v. Revette, 102 A.D.3d 1065, 1066, 958 N.Y.S.2d 805 [2013] ). Nevertheless, our review of the plea colloquy reveals that defendant's plea was entered into knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently. County Court engaged in a detailed plea colloquy, informing defendant of the ramifications of pleading guilty and the rights he would be relinquishing by doing so. Defendant confirmed that he had consulted with counsel and that he was entering into the plea of his own will. Significantly, defendant expressly stated during the colloquy that he had not been forced into pleading guilty and that he was satisfied with the services of his counsel. Accordingly, we conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without a hearing ( see People v. Carpenter, 93 A.D.3d 950, 951–952, 939 N.Y.S.2d 658 [2012],lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 863, 947 N.Y.S.2d 411, 970 N.E.2d 434 [2012];People v. Waters, 80 A.D.3d 1002, 1003, 914 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2011],lvs. denied16 N.Y.3d 858, 864, 923 N.Y.S.2d 420, 426, 947 N.E.2d 1199, 1205 [2011];People v. Hayes, 71 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 896 N.Y.S.2d 225 [2010],lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 852, 909 N.Y.S.2d 29, 935 N.E.2d 821 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

PETERS, P.J., ROSE and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hoyt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 23, 2013
106 A.D.3d 1340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Hoyt

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adrian K. HOYT Jr.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 23, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 1340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
106 A.D.3d 1340
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3713

Citing Cases

People v. Plass

County Court distinguished the right to appeal from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea and…

People v. Plass

County Court distinguished the right to appeal from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea and…