From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Howze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1997
243 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 20, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.)


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court improperly imposed a harsher sentence than it had originally promised is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Gayle, 224 A.D.2d 710; People v K.F., 208 A.D.2d 948; People v. Ellis, 162 A.D.2d 701) and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Howze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1997
243 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Howze

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAMON HOWZE, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
668 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

People v. Bouttry

Moreover, the attorney's performance could not be characterized as either deficient or prejudicial to…

State v. Browning

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that the County Court improperly imposed a…