From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Howell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 7, 1966
25 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

April 7, 1966

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: At a preliminary hearing conducted by the trial court evidence was presented as to the circumstances surrounding the taking of certain inculpatory statements from the defendant by police officers which required a finding by the court as to whether the defendant incriminated himself while being interrogated by the police in the absence of counsel after he had requested the aid of an attorney ( People v. Sanchez, 15 N.Y.2d 387). The court ruled that "from the evidence presented by the District Attorney on behalf of the People and the defendant, the court finds that the alleged confession was voluntarily made and that none of the constitutional rights had been violated." Defendant's statements were received over objection on the trial, which resulted in a verdict of guilty of arson, first degree. The Trial Judge's decision was clearly against the weight of the evidence, and it was reversible error to allow the statements to be received in evidence.


Summaries of

People v. Howell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 7, 1966
25 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

People v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLARENCE W. HOWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)