From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hoppie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.).


Ordered that the amended sentence is modified, on the law, by reducing it to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 2/3 to 8 years; as so modified, the amended sentence is affirmed.

We agree with the defendant that, under the unusual circumstances of this case, he established a legitimate expectation in the finality of his original sentence of 8 years' imprisonment, and the Supreme Court's imposition of a maximum term of imprisonment of more than 8 years upon resentencing the defendant violated the prohibition against double jeopardy (see, Stewart v. Scully, 925 F.2d 58). The illegality of the defendant's original sentence should have been corrected by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment to one third of the maximum. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hoppie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Hoppie

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HADRIAN A. HOPPIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 33

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

v Brown, 87 NY2d 626; Matter of Echevarria v Marks, 57 AD3d 1479; Matter of Plummer v Rothwax, 63 NY2d 243;…

People v. Trimm

Defendant appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the higher maximum sentence violates the Double Jeopardy Clause…