From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1982
442 N.E.2d 1267 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided October 19, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HOWARD E. GOLDFLUSS, J.

William E. Hellerstein and John D.B. Lewis for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney ( Debra S. Reiser of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed and a new trial ordered. The trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit testimony regarding defendant's statements in that the prosecution was duty bound to inform the defense of the existence of those statements, which in effect were used as direct evidence of guilt ( People v Ricco, 56 N.Y.2d 320), pursuant to CPL 710.30 ( People v Briggs, 38 N.Y.2d 319).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and Meyer.


Summaries of

People v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1982
442 N.E.2d 1267 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Hoover

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES HOOVER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 1982

Citations

442 N.E.2d 1267 (N.Y. 1982)
442 N.E.2d 1267
456 N.Y.S.2d 756

Citing Cases

People v. Valle

Failure of the police department to advise the District Attorney's office of the police department's…

People v. Schiavi

In light of that fact, and of the facts that the Trial Judge's finding rested in part on the presumption of…