From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hook

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 5, 2016
138 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-05-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John HOOK, Defendant–Appellant.

Leonard J. Levenson, New York, for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Oliver McDonald of counsel), for respondent.


Leonard J. Levenson, New York, for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Oliver McDonald of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia M. Nunez, J.), rendered September 26, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second drug felony offender, to a term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly found that defendant violated the no-arrest condition of his plea agreement, and thus forfeited the opportunity to have his conviction replaced by a misdemeanor conviction. There was a legitimate basis for the arrest (see People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, 712–713, 594 N.Y.S.2d 683, 610 N.E.2d 356 [1993] ), notwithstanding that it resulted in an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (see People v. Smith, 248 A.D.2d 179, 670 N.Y.S.2d 766 [1st Dept.1998], lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 1013, 676 N.Y.S.2d 141, 698 N.E.2d 970 [1998] ). The prosecutor's statement indicated that defendant was arrested for assaulting his wife with a hot iron in front of their young son. Defendant conceded his involvement in the incident, but claimed justification. The court had ample basis to reject that defense (see e.g. People v. Redwood, 41 A.D.3d 275, 275, 838 N.Y.S.2d 66 [1st Dept.2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 880, 842 N.Y.S.2d 792, 874 N.E.2d 759 [2007] ), and in any event defendant was not entitled to a minitrial on the issue of whether the evidence disproved justification (see Outley, 80 N.Y.2d at 712–713, 594 N.Y.S.2d 683, 610 N.E.2d 356). Under the circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion in declining to conduct a more extensive hearing or to consider police and medical records, and any error in this regard was harmless.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hook

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 5, 2016
138 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Hook

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John HOOK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 5, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
138 A.D.3d 411
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2564

Citing Cases

People v. Grant

Defendant did not dispute his failure to attend the counseling sessions and conceded his involvement in the…