From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holt

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 22, 2006
721 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 128034.

September 22, 2006.

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal SC: 128034, COA: 250580, Muskegon CC: 02-047915-FC.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal September 22, 2006:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCL 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether there was a violation of the 180-day rule, MCL 780.131, in this case in light of People v Williams, 475 Mich 245 (2006), and whether the time limitation set forth in MCL 780.131 is subject to waiver or extension for any reason, such as prosecutor good faith, mutual agreement of the parties, or time attributable to the defendant, including requests for adjournment. The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

People v. Holt

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 22, 2006
721 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDY SEAN HOLT…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 22, 2006

Citations

721 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 2006)
477 Mich. 860

Citing Cases

People v. Holt

Specifically, we ordered the parties to address whether there was a violation of the 180-day rule, MCL…

Holt v. Lacy

In light of the People v. Williams decision, the Michigan Supreme Court invited supplemental briefing on…