From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 19, 1996

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Lawton, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly revoked the sentence of probation based upon defendant's admitted failure to make timely monthly restitution payments ( see, People v. Ray, 105 A.D.2d 988). The sentence of two to six years' imprisonment is not unduly harsh or severe.

In his pro se supplemental brief, defendant challenges the propriety of the original sentence of probation and the amount of restitution fixed by the court as a condition of that sentence. Those arguments are not properly before us on appeal from the judgment revoking the sentence of probation and resentencing defendant ( see, CPL 450.30; People v. Dabbs, 178 A.D.2d 848, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 946).


Summaries of

People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL HOLMES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 133

Citing Cases

People v. Ralston

Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking probation based upon a finding that he violated its conditions and…

People v. Postula

Although defendant contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that he did not validly…