From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 23, 2022
202 A.D.3d 1106 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2019–09483 S.C.I. No. 1815/17

02-23-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kareem HOLMAN, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel; Yasmine Bailey on the memorandum), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel; Yasmine Bailey on the memorandum), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, ROBERT J. MILLER, WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ellen E. Edwards, J.), imposed June 28, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

CONNOLLY, J.P., RIVERA, MILLER and FORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Holman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 23, 2022
202 A.D.3d 1106 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Holman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kareem HOLMAN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

Citations

202 A.D.3d 1106 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
159 N.Y.S.3d 907