From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holloway

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 22, 2015
130 A.D.3d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

07-22-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony HOLLOWAY, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Adrienne Gantt of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Adrienne Gantt of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed January 3, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Armstrong, 127 A.D.3d 1100, 1101, 5 N.Y.S.3d 890 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., SKELOS, AUSTIN, ROMAN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Holloway

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 22, 2015
130 A.D.3d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Holloway

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony HOLLOWAY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 22, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
130 A.D.3d 943
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6256