From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holloway

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 29, 2014
113 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-01-29

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Derrick HOLLOWAY, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), imposed April 26, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. DeSimone, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposedwas not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). ENG, P.J., SKELOS, ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Holloway

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 29, 2014
113 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Holloway

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Derrick HOLLOWAY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 29, 2014

Citations

113 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
113 A.D.3d 876
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 532

Citing Cases

People v. Holloway

Rivera2d Dept.: 113 A.D.3d 876, 979 N.Y.S.2d 532 (Suffolk) Rivera,…