From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hollister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1976
52 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 6, 1976


Appeal from judgments of the County Court of Chemung County, both rendered August 12, 1975, convicting defendant, on separate pleas of guilty, of the crime of attempted forgery in the second degree and the crime of burglary in the third degree and imposing two concurrent indeterminate sentences not to exceed three years. Defendant, on this appeal, asserts the sentences are unduly harsh and excessive. The concurrent indeterminate sentences are not unduly harsh and excessive and this court will not, under the circumstances present herein, interfere with the discretion of the trial court (People v Caputo, 13 A.D.2d 861). Judgments affirmed. Greenblott, J.P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hollister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1976
52 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Hollister

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARVIN HOLLISTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 6, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)