Opinion
Docket No. 153306. COA No. 330680.
06-28-2016
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. James Kalvin HOLDER, Defendant–Appellant.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.
We do not retain jurisdiction.