From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BALIO, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Contrary to the contention of defendant, the verdict is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Defendant freely bargained for the maximum sentence upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in satisfaction of pending charges of, inter alia, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree ( see, People v. Kohler, 147 A.D.2d 937, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 1017; see also, People v. Cotton, 219 A.D.2d 836, 837, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 900).


Summaries of

People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID L. HOGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 413

Citing Cases

People v. Saccone

Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable and thus does not…

People v. Saccone

Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable and thus does not…