From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defense counsel raised a Batson challenge during jury selection ( see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79), he failed to "articulate and develop all of the grounds supporting the claim, both factual and legal, during the colloquy in which the objection was raised and discussed" ( People v. Childress, 81 N.Y.2d 263, 268; People v. Stokes, 216 A.D.2d 337), and thus failed to establish a prima facie "pattern of purposeful exclusion" ( People v. Bolling, 79 N.Y.2d 317, 325).

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15; People v. Griffin, 161 A.D.2d 799). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY HOGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 905