From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1986
125 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 8, 1986

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed upon the defendant as a second violent felony offender on his conviction of burglary in the second degree is the minimum permissible sentence (Penal Law § 70.04 [b]) and, therefore, may not be considered excessive. Nor does the record support a finding that the imposition of this sentence is unconstitutional as applied to this defendant (see, People v Kepple, 98 A.D.2d 783; see also, People v. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100).

Finally, the denial of the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to set aside his prior violent conviction is not reviewable on the appeal from the judgment in this case. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1986
125 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Hoffman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WARREN HOFFMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. DeMent

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The sentence imposed does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment…