From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1082) KAH 00-01809.

September 28, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fahey, J. — Habeas Corpus.)

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner challenges his continued incarceration beyond the date on which he became eligible for conditional release. Petitioner was not released because he failed to comply with the special condition that he secure housing approved by the Division of Parole (Division) prior to his conditional release. Because petitioner is not entitled to immediate release, habeas corpus relief does not lie ( see, People ex rel. Travis v. Coombe, 219 A.D.2d 881, 881-882). Further, "[a]lthough this Court has the power to convert a petition for a writ of habeas corpus into a CPLR article 78 petition", that relief is not appropriate here ( People ex rel. Travis v. Coombe, supra, at 882). Contrary to petitioner's contention, "it is within the discretion of the Division to impose the special condition of securing approved housing, even though the condition must be satisfied before his request of conditional release can be granted" ( Matter of Monroe v. Travis, 280 A.D.2d 675, 676, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 714; see, People ex rel. Wilson v. Keane, 267 A.D.2d 686, appeal dismissed 95 N.Y.2d 824). Also contrary to petitioner's contention, there is no requirement that the special condition of release be filed with the Secretary of State ( see, People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni, 166 A.D.2d 926, 927, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 714).


Summaries of

People v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Hodges

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. VICTOR BEAM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 416

Citing Cases

People v. Superintendent

After the expiration of the six-month period, when the petitioner had still not identified SARA-compliant…

People v. Dep't of Corr.

asserts that the Board abused its discretion and exceeded its authority when it chose to impose the mandatory…