From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hobbs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1961
14 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

November 27, 1961


Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated November 21, 1960, denying, without a hearing, his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered March 7, 1930, upon his plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him to serve a term of two to four years. Order affirmed. The defendant urges that at the time of the 1930 conviction he was not represented by counsel, nor was he advised of his right to counsel. Defendant made a previous coram nobis application in February, 1954, before the same court, based on the identical grounds. At that time the court took proof and conducted a full hearing concerning defendant's arraignment and sentencing with respect to the 1930 conviction. After such hearing the court denied his coram nobis application by an order dated May 18, 1954. No effective appeal was taken from such order. Where a second or later application is made, and where upon such application the defendant fails to allege any new or additional facts, with the result that the later application is in all material respects the same as the prior application, there is no reason why a hearing must be conducted on the later application ( People v. Sullivan, 4 N.Y.2d 472; People v. Merritte, 11 A.D.2d 628). Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hobbs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1961
14 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

People v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERNEST HOBBS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

People v. Keitt

Aside from the additional claim of having been promised a short sentence, the present application made by the…

People v. Jones

While the defendant makes no mention of the prior motions made by him, as has been shown, the relief applied…