From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hobart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1045) KA 00-01612.

September 28, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HAYES, WISNER, KEHOE AND BURNS, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 25 years to life, defendant contends that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because Supreme Court refused to assign new counsel at defendant's request and because the plea was induced by the threat of a heavier sentence if defendant did not plead guilty. Those contentions are unpreserved for our review because defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see, People v. Woods, 281 A.D.2d 929; People v. Nixon, 278 A.D.2d 941, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 786; People v. Harriott, 277 A.D.2d 987). Indeed, it appears that defendant abandoned his request for a substitution of counsel, deciding instead to plead guilty while still being represented by the same attorney. In any event, we discern no basis on this record for a mandatory substitution of counsel ( see generally, People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822, 824-825; People v. Medina, 44 N.Y.2d 199, 206-209). The court made the requisite "minimal inquiry" into "the nature of the disagreement or its potential for resolution" ( People v. Sides, supra, at 825), and defendant was unable to articulate any basis for substitution of counsel ( see, People v. Sides, supra, at 824; People v. Brant, 277 A.D.2d 1022, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 756; People v. Schojan, 272 A.D.2d 932, 933, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 871; People v. Benson, 265 A.D.2d 814, 814-815, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 860, cert denied 529 U.S. 1076).

There is no merit to defendant's further contention that the plea was involuntary because it was coerced by the explicit threat of a heavier sentence ( see, People v. Hecht, 257 A.D.2d 493, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 853; People v. Miles, 256 A.D.2d 157). The risk of a heavier sentence after trial does not render a plea involuntary ( see, People v. Dashnaw, 260 A.D.2d 658, 659, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 968; People v. Polite, 259 A.D.2d 566, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 1025; People v. Hillendale, 244 A.D.2d 911, 912; People v. Gibson, 167 A.D.2d 921, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 961).


Summaries of

People v. Hobart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Hobart

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KENNETH A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 127

Citing Cases

People v. Velasquez

After sufficient inquiry, the court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea ( see…

People v. Ocasio

Defendant requested substitution of counsel in a letter received by the court approximately five months…