From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

March, 1934.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Untermyer, JJ.


No evidence was adduced to establish the fact that defendant knowingly left the scene of the accident. To the contrary, the testimony of the defendant's witnesses proved conclusively that the taxicab driver was not aware of the fact that his taxicab came in contact with complainant's car. There is no violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law, section 70, subdivision 5-a, unless it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had knowledge that there was an accident. ( People v. Thomas, 232 App. Div. 475; People v. Shlansky, 256 N.Y. 538; People ex rel. Scott v. Goldman, 236 App. Div. 788.) Judgment reversed, the information dismissed and the fine remitted.


Summaries of

People v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

People v. Hirsch

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, on the Complaint of PATRICK J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Touchstone v. State

This does not mean that the person should have positive knowledge of the extent of the damage or injuries…

People v. Slocum

The People respond in essence (1) that the degree of scienter required is a matter for the trier of fact and…