A statement meeting the requirements for an excited utterance may occur even hours after the startling event. See e.g. People v. Brown, 70 N.Y.2d at 521, 522 N.Y.S.2d at 841 ("[a] lapse of 30 minutes, is not, as a matter of law, too long" for the excited utterance exception to apply); People v. Hasan, 2005 WL 845378 at *2 (2d Dep't Apr. 11, 2005) (statement made 10 minutes after incident was an excited utterance within the exception); People v. Hiraldo, 284 A.D.2d 258, 258, 726 N.Y.S.2d 558, 558 (1st Dep't) (excited utterance exception applies to statement made while victim was being treated at the hospital), appeal denied, 96 N.Y.2d 919, 732 N.Y.S.2d 636 (2001); see also, e.g., White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. a 349-50, 112 S. Ct. at 739 (statements by victim to police 45 minutes after sexual assault and to medical personnel at hospital four hours after assault held to be excited utterances); United States v.Tocco, 135 F.3d 116, 127-28 (2d Cir. 1998) (record "amply supports" admission of a statement made three hours after an arson when the defendant was still "'all hyped' and 'nervous.'");United States v. Scarpa, 913 F.2d 993, 1017 (2d Cir. 1990) (statement made after delay of five to six hours is an excited utterance when witness is still under "the stress of excitement").