From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 31, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's primary contention on appeal is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Although the defense counsel's opening remarks opened the door for the People to elicit testimony as to the complainant's prior photographic identification of the defendant, we find that under the circumstances of this case the defense counsel's reference to the photographic array "was at most a mistaken judgment as to trial strategy and cannot be characterized as ineffective assistance of counsel" (see, People v Jackson, 52 N.Y.2d 1027, 1029; see also, People v Morris, 100 A.D.2d 630, 631, affd 64 N.Y.2d 803). In addition, we reject the defendant's contention that trial counsel incompetently presented the alibi defense. The mere fact that the defense was unsuccessful does not establish that the defendant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel (People v Santillana, 118 A.D.2d 669, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 950), and it is "not for [the] court to second-guess whether a course chosen by the defendant's counsel was the best trial strategy, or even a good one, so long as defendant was afforded meaningful representation" (People v Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 799-800). Upon our review of the record we are satisfied that the defense counsel provided meaningful representation to the defendant (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). Moreover, we find that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Hinton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONNELL HINTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Tuzzio

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. The…

People v. Joseph

Thus, the defense counsel's insistence on having the officer testify was clearly trial strategy. Merely…