Opinion
May 21, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.).
Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed.
The court properly revoked both sentences of probation based on the defendant's pleas of guilty to violating the provisions thereof and on his convictions for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest (see, People v. Hicks, 138 Misc.2d 608). In any event, the court properly found by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant had failed to follow the directives of his probation officer (see, People v. Gardner, 116 A.D.2d 735).
Considering the nature of the underlying crimes of rape in the first degree and burglary in the third degree, the defendant's criminal history, his convictions while on probation, and his failure to adapt to the rules of an orderly society, we see no reason to disturb the sentences imposed. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.