From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdict is not preserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Copertino, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Hines

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEX HINES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 351