From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1988
141 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 27, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.).


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied his constitutional rights to due process of law and equal protection of the laws because of the delay in perfecting the instant appeal by two prior assigned appellate counsel.

While New York has acknowledged such a due process right with reference to the appellate process (see, People v Cousart, 58 N.Y.2d 62), on the record before us we find that summary reversal is not warranted. Both of the previously assigned appellate attorneys had moved to dismiss the appeal or to be relieved as counsel. Those motions were granted to the extent of relieving each counsel of his duty to prosecute this appeal. It does not appear that defendant opposed those motions nor did he ever indicate dissatisfaction with his representation or seek to expedite his appeal. Brown, J.P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1988
141 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD HILL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Sanders

The defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because of the delay…