From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 17, 1998

Appeal from the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.).


Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree based upon County Court's commitment that it would sentence defendant as a second felony offender to a prison term of 1 1/2 to 3 years. When defendant appeared for sentencing, County Court informed him that it would not accede to the agreed-upon sentence based upon the information contained in the presentence report. Thereafter, defendant declined the opportunity to withdraw his plea given County Court's commitment to sentence defendant as a second felony offender to a prison term of 2 to 4 years, which sentence the court ultimately imposed. Defendant appeals.

We reject defendant's contention that County Court abused its discretion in failing to abide by the original plea agreement inasmuch as the court retained discretion to impose an appropriate sentence until the time of sentencing ( see, People v. Schultz, 73 N.Y.2d 757, 758; People v. Sheckton, 239 A.D.2d 617). County Court adequately noted that its departure from the original agreed-upon sentence was due to the information contained in the presentence report which noted the serious nature of the slant offense, defendant's propensity for violence and his numerous misconduct reports while incarcerated. Moreover, defendant failed to establish that he irrevocably changed his position in reliance on County Court's initial sentencing promise ( see, People v. Schultz, supra; People v. McConnell, 49 N.Y.2d 340, 347). Notwithstanding defendant's contention to the contrary, we do not find the sentence imposed to be harsh or excessive. Defendant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

White, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENT HILL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 119

Citing Cases

People v. Brunelle

We affirm. Noting that County Court retained the discretion to impose an appropriate sentence up until the…