From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hidalgo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 3, 2020
181 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11192 SCI 22/18

03-03-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jonathan HIDALGO, Defendant–Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Chamoy of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Chamoy of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Webber, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hidalgo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 3, 2020
181 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Hidalgo

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jonathan Hidalgo…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 3, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1452
117 N.Y.S.3d 561